Auditor's Professional Skepticism: An Empirical Study At Public Accounting Firm In Central Java Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v25i1.726Abstract
This study examines and analyzes the effect of experience, expertise, audit situation, ethics, and legal certainty on auditors' professional skepticism. The sample of this research is auditors who work at a public accounting firm in Central Java Province. Samples were taken using the non-probability sampling method, using the purposive sampling technique with 104 auditors as respondents. The analysis method used is PLS analysis. The research results show that experience and ethics affect the professional skepticism of auditors, while expertise, audit situation, and legal certainty do not affect the professional skepticism of auditors. The results of this study are expected to maintain the professional skepticism of auditors in evaluating critical audit evidence.
References
Agoes, S. (2012). Auditing Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntansi oleh Akuntan Publik. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Alfa, R.D.L.C. dan Indarto, S.L. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Penugasan Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 11(22), 115-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v11i22.418. http://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/jab/article/view/418.
Ansari, R. dan Hendarjatno. (2014). Perbedaan Persepsi Resiko Audit, Materialitas Dan Kualitas Audit Sebelum Dan Sesudah Ketentuan Pidana UU NO. 5 Tahun 2011 Tentang AKuntan Publik (Studi Persepsi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Surabaya). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga, 24(2), 139-149. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JEBA/issue/view/496.
Chin, W. W. (1995). Partial Least Squares is to LISREL as Principal Components Analysis is to Common Factor Analysis. Technology Studies , 2, 315-319.
Chin, W.C. and Todd, P.A. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modelling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19, 237-246.
Cooper, Donal R and Scindler, Pamela. (2006). Busines Research Methods. The MC Grow-Hill Lumpanies: Singapore.
Drupadi, M. J. dan Sudana, I.P, (2016). Pengaruh Keahlian Auditor, Tekanan Ketaatan Dan Independensi Terhadap Audit Judgment. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(3), 623-655. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/17839.
Hair, J., Hault, G., Ringle, C., and Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equations Modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage: United States of America.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2001). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Jauharia, H. H. A. (2012). Optimalisasi Profesionalisme Auditor Melalui Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2011. Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan dan Perbankan, 1(2). 97-104. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe9/article/view/1589.
Noviyanti, Suzy. (2008). Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(1), 102-125.
Robbins, Stephen P. dan Judge, T.A. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 16. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
Silalahi, S. P. (2013). Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman Audit dan Situasi Audit Terhadap Skeptisme Profesional Auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi, 21 (03).
Suraida, Ida. (2005). Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman Audit dan Resiko Audit Terhadap Skeptisme Profesional Auditor dan Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Akuntan publik. Sosiohumaniora, 7(3). 186-202. DOI : https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v7i3.5351. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/sosiohumaniora/article/view/5351.
Sutrisno, S. dan Fajarwati, D. (2016). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Keahlian, Situasi Audit, Etika Dan Gender Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor Melalui Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor (Studi kasus pada KAP di Bekasi). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 5(02). 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33558/jrak.v5i2.1341. https://journal.unismabekasi.ac.id/index.php/jrak/article/view/1341
Winantyadi, N. dan Waluyo, I. (2014). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Keahlian, Situasi Audit, dan Etika terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor (Studi Kasus pada KAP di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 3(1). 14-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v3i1.2151. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/nominal/article/view/2151.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License