The Propensity For Social Entrepreneurship During The Coronavirus Outbreak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v24i2.637Abstract
This research aims to explore scholarly the propensity for social entrepreneurship (PSE) under the condition of Coronavirus outbreak (Covid-19) and the large scale of social distancing in Jakarta, Indonesia. Entrepreneurial education is expected to encourage awareness of social problems among students. This research examines the relationship between perceived social supports and PSE. Additionally, it investigates the mediating effect of self-efficacy that links among empathy, moral obligation, and prior experience towards PSE. As many as 180 students filled the questionnaire through google forms during April 22-29th 2020. By using Smart-PLS proves a significant effect of perceived social support toward PSE and discovers the mediation effect on social entrepreneurial self-efficacy. The result shows a positive mindset on social entrepreneurship among students whereas this pandemic is as a trigger to intent in social entrepreneurship. It is a mechanism when understanding the social entrepreneurial education for students, thus leaders can utilize to improve regulation in the entrepreneurship learning program.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology., 32(4), 665–83.
Aure, P. A. P. (2018). Exploring the Social Entrepreneurial Intentions of Senior High School and College Students in a Philipine University: A PLS-SEM Approach. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21(2), 1–11.
Aure, P. A. P., Dui, R. P., Jimenez, S. V., Daradar, D. D., Gutierrez, A. N. A., Blasa, A. C., and Sy-Changco, J. (2019). Understanding Social Entrepreneurial Intention Through Social Cognitive Career Theory: a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2019.10.00005.
Austin, J. E. (2006). Three Avenues for Social Entrepreneurship Research. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 22–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_3.
Ayob, N., Yap, C. S., Sapuan, D. A., and Rashid, M. Z. A. (2013). Social Entrepreneurial Intention among Business Undergraduates: An Emerging Economy Perspective. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 15(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5470.
Bird, B. (1988). Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.2307/258091.
British Council, and UNESCAP. (2018). Developing an Inclusive and Creative Economy: The State of Social Enterprise in Indonesia. Jakarta: British Council Indonesia.
Chinchilla, A., and Garcia, M. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship Intention: Mindfulness Towards a Duality of Objectives. Humanistic Management Journal, 1, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-016-0013-3.
Cho, A. H. (2006). Politics, Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Appraisal. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 34–56). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_4.
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., and Tracey, P. (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620.
De Groot, J. I. M., and Steg, L. (2009). Morality and Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Awareness, Responsibility, and Norms in the Norm Activation Model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449.
Decety, J., and Jackson, P. L. (2004). The Functional Architecture of Human Empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Kansas. Retrieved from https://community-wealth.org/content/meaning-social-entrepreneurship.
Defourny, J., and Kim, S.-Y. (2011). Emerging Models of Social Enterprise in Eastern Asia: A Cross‐Country Analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111130176.
Haines, R., Street, M., and Haines, D. (2008). The Influence of Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue on Moral Judgment, Moral Obligation, and Moral Intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9502-5.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
Hockerts, K. (2006). Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Social Purpose Business Ventures. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 142–154). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_10.
Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12171.
Ip, C. Y., Wu, S.-C., Liu, H.-C., and Liang, C. (2017). Revisiting the Antecedents of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2017.2835.
Koe, W.-L., Omar, R., and Majid, I. A. (2014). Factors Associated with Propensity for Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.009.
Koe, W.-L., Omar, R., and Sa’ari, J. R. (2015). Factors Influencing Propensity to Sustainable Entrepreneurship of SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.404.
Krueger, N. F. (1993). The Impact of Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure on Perceptions of New Venture Feasibility and Desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879301800101.
Krueger JR, N. F., Reilly, M. D., and Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.
Mair, J., and Martí, I. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002.
Mair, J., and Noboa, E. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: How Intentions to Create a Social Venture are Formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 121–135). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_8.
McDonald, N. L., and Messinger, D. S. (2011). The Development of Empathy: How, When, and Why. In A. Acerbi, J. A. Lombo, & J. . Sanguineti (Eds.), Free will, Emotions, and Moral Actions: Philosophy and Neuroscience in Dialogue (pp. 1–36). Miami: University of Miami, Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://local.psy.miami.edu/faculty/dmessinger/c_c/rsrcs/rdgs/emot/McDonald-Messinger_Empathy Development.pdf.
Peredo, A. M., and McLean, M. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review of the Concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007.
Pihie, Z. A. L., Bagheri, A., and Sani, Z. H. A. (2013). Knowledge of Cognition and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Implications for Learning Entrepreneurship in Public and Private Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.219.
Pratono, A. H., Pramudija, P., and Sutanti, A. (2016). Social Enterprise in Indonesia: Emerging Models under Transition Government (International Comparative Social Enterprose Models (ICSEM) No. 36). ICSEM Working Paper. Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.jolkona.org/social-enterprise-in-indonesia/.
Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating Social and Institutional Barriers to Markets: How Social Entrepreneurs Identify and Evaluate Opportunities. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 95–120). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_7.
Shapero, A., and Sokol, L. (1982). Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Prentice-Hall.
Shaw, E., and Carter, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: Theoretical Antecedents and Empirical Analysis of Entrepreneurial Process and Outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529.
Shumate, M., Atouba, Y., Cooper, K. R., and Pilny, A. (2014). Two Paths Diverged: Examining the Antecedents to Social Entrepreneurship. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(3), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914538561.
Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive Empathy and Emotional Empathy in Human Behavior and Evolution. The Psychological Record, 56, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
Tiwari, P., Bhat, A. K., and Tikoria, J. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting Social Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7(9), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-017-0067-1.
Turker, D., and Sonmez Selcuk, S. (2009). Which Factors Affect Entrepreneurial Intention of University Students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910939049.
Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Willer, R. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z.
WCED, U. (1987). Development and International Economic Co-Operation: Environment. England.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Manajemen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License