ESG Controversies in ASEAN-5: The Role of Board Structure and Governance Characteristics

Choirun Nisak; Badingatus  Solikhah

doi:10.24912/ja.v30i1.3509

Authors

Choirun Nisak Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
Badingatus Solikhah Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v30i1.3509

Keywords: Corporate Governance; ESG Controversies; ASEAN-5.

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of corporate governance mechanisms on ESG controversies among non-financial ASEAN-5 firms from 2021–2024, with firm size as a moderator. Using a Fixed Effects Model with PCSE, the findings show that audit committee independence and board gender diversity significantly reduce ESG controversies, whereas board independence increases controversy exposure due to greater transparency. CEO duality exhibits a marginally positive effect. Firm size weakens the positive effects of CEO duality, audit committee independence, and gender diversity, while reducing the adverse effect of board independence. Robustness tests confirm the consistency of results. Overall, the study emphasizes that the role of governance in mitigating ESG controversies depends on organizational scale and institutional context.

Author Biographies

Choirun Nisak, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

choirunnisak@students.unnes.ac.id

Badingatus Solikhah, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

badingatusbety@mail.unnes.ac.id

References

Abu Khalaf, B., Alqahtani, M. S., & Al-Naimi, M. S. (2025). ESG Controversies and the Financial Performance of MENA Firms: The Moderating Role of Board Characteristics. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115055

Agarwala, N., Pareek, R., & Sahu, T. N. (2023). Does board independence influence CSR performance? A GMM-based dynamic panel data approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(6), 1003–1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2020-0433

Agnese, P., Battaglia, F., Busato, F., & Taddeo, S. (2023). ESG controversies and governance: Evidence from the banking industry. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103397

Alves, S. (2023). CEO duality, earnings quality and board independence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2020-0191

Aly, D. A. R. M., Hasan, A., Obioru, B., & Nakpodia, F. (2024). Corporate governance and environmental disclosure: a comparative analysis. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 24(8), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2024-0063

Apriono, M., Fadah, I., Wardayati, S. M., Niken, R., Aprillianto, B., Wahyuni, N. I., & Awwaliyah, I. (2023). The Effect of Financial Performance and Environmental Sensitivity on ESG Disclosure: Empirical Study in Agro-industrial Sector. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management (IJABIM, 8(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v8i3.25

Arici, H. E., Aladag, O. F., & Koseoglu, M. A. (2025). How Does CEO Duality Influence ESG Scores in Hospitality and Tourism Companies? Confounding Roles of Governance Mechanisms and Financial Indicators. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 49(5), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241266154

Arslan, H. M., Mubeen, M., Chen, S., Naseer, K., & Yaseen, S. (2024). Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainability Disclosures-A Meta-Analytical Perspective. In Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (Vol. 2024, Issue 4). https://doi.org/https://jes.ac.pk/index.php/jes/article/view/26

Ashraf, M., Choudhary, P., & Jaggi, J. (2019). The Scope of Audit Committee Oversight and Financial Reporting Reliability: Are Audit Committees Overloaded? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3433389

Baalouch, F., Ayadi, S. D., & Hussainey, K. (2019). A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: evidence from French listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(4), 939–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09474-0

Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979

Buchetti, B., Arduino, F. R., & Perdichizzi, S. (2025). A literature review on corporate governance and ESG research: Emerging trends and future directions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103759

Chen, K. S., Lin, S. T., & Chuang, C. J. (2025). ESG Strategies and Sustainable Performance in Multinational Enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020751

De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., & Paci, A. (2022). Women on boards and corporate environmental performance in Italian companies: The importance of nomination background. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 31(4), 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12467

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887

Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1

Fadhila, S. N., Biduri, S., Rahma Dewi, S., & Maryanti, E. (2023). Can Company Size Moderate Good Corporate Governance on Disclosure of Sustainability Reports? Journal of Accounting Science, 7(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v7i1.1698

Fang, L., & Guo, X. (2025). From responsibility to value: ESG and long-term corporate value. PLoS ONE, 20(4 APRIL). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322018

Fernandes, S. M., Bornia, A. C., & Nakamura, L. R. (2019). The influence of boards of directors on environmental disclosure. Management Decision, 57(9), 2358–2382. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2017-1084

Fernandez, V. (2025). Corporate greenwashing and green management indicators. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100599

Freeman, R. E, Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581

Freire, C. (2019). Duality CEO-Chairman and its relation with the effectiveness of the board control. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.20

Frooman, J. (1997). Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth. Business & Society, 36(3), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600302

Gabriela, de A. P., & Paula Pontes, de C.-R. (2024). Do ESG Controversies Influence Firm Value? An Analysis with Longitudinal Data in Different Countries. Brazilian Business Review, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.1326.en

Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Rodriguez-Dominguez, L. (2025). Board of directors and environmental practices: the effect of board experience, culture, and tenure. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(1), 1643–1668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03937-z

García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Aibar-Guzmán, C., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2025). ESG controversies and external assurance: Examining their impact on firm value and image. British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101704

Gerged, A. M. (2021). Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2642

Ghafoor, A., & Gull, A. A. (2024). Do co-opted boards protect CEOs from ESG controversies? Finance Research Letters, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105263

Gómez Martínez, R., Medrano-Garcia, M. L., & Amo Navas, D. (2024). Evaluating ESG performance: The influence of firm size and gender diversity. Small Business International Review, 8(2), e693. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v8i2.693

Gull, A. A., Haq, I. U., Ghafoor, A., Ahsan, T., & Bayraktar, Y. (2025). When do female directors curb corporate ESG controversies? Evidence from the USA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146746

Haekal, I., Taqi, M., & Susanto, D. (2024). The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics, Audit Opinion, and Company Size on Financial Reporting Fraud. Finance and Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.58968/fs.v2i1.526

Harun, M. S., Hussainey, K., Mohd Kharuddin, K. A., & Farooque, O. Al. (2020). CSR Disclosure, Corporate Governance and Firm Value: a study on GCC Islamic Banks. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(4), 607–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2019-0103

Hassan, M. K., Houston, R., Karim, M. S., & Sabit, A. (2023). CEO duality and firm performance during the 2020 coronavirus outbreak. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00278

Ho, L., Nguyen, V. H., & Dang, T. L. (2024). ESG and firm performance: do stakeholder engagement, financial constraints and religiosity matter? Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 31(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-08-2023-0306

Hu, X., Lin, D., & Tosun, O. K. (2023). The effect of board independence on firm performance–new evidence from product market conditions. European Journal of Finance, 29(4), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2022.2049448

Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, J. M. de. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017

Iannuzzi, A. P., Dell’Atti, S., D’Apolito, E., & Galletta, S. (2023). Nomination committee characteristics and exposure to environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies: evidence from European global systemically important banks. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(6), 1314–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0119

Iryanti, I., Mawardi, W., Muharam, H., & Wahyudi, S. (2023). Gender Diversity of Board and Debt: Firm size moderating Role (Evidence from Indonesia). IBIMA Business Review, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5171/2023.530892

Issa, A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: the power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-03-2023-0053

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jucá, M. N., Muren, P. D., Valentinčič, A., & Ichev, R. (2024). The impact of ESG controversies on the financial performance of firms: An analysis of industry and country clusters. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(6), 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.08.001

Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. (2022). ESG in the boardroom: evidence from the Malaysian market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-00072-2

Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1883

Lassoued, N., & Khanchel, I. (2023). Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: the moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 17(3), 1075–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00555-3

Lin, X., Yu, L., Zhang, J., Lin, S., & Zhong, Q. (2022). Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215020

Liu, Y., Wu, B., & Zhang, M. (2023). Can independent directors identify the company’s risk of financial fraud: Evidence from predicting financial fraud based on machine learning. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 11(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2023.2239670

Ma, S., & Ma, T. (2025). ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Evidence from A-Share Companies in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062750

Mallidis, I., Giannarakis, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2024). Impact of board gender diversity on environmental, social, and ESG controversies performance: The moderating role of United Nations Global Compact and ISO. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 141047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141047

Mansour, M., Al Zobi, M., Altawalbeh, M., Abu Alim, S., Lutfi, A., Marashdeh, Z., Al-Nohood, S., & Al Barrak, T. (2024). Female leadership and environmental innovation: do gender boards make a difference? Discover Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00545-3

Meeprom, S., Boonyanet, W., & Tongkong, S. (2024). Relationship of ESG scores on firm performance: Moderating roles of board size and CEO duality. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(7), 4403. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4403

Muhammad, H., & Tadele, H. (2025). Corporate governance and ESG controversies: a quantile regression approach. Corporate Governance (Bingley). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2024-0616

Mulyana, D., Widyaningsih, A., & Rozali, R. D. Y. (2025). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Corporate Value: Unpacking the Moderating Effect of Company Size. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Airlangga, 35(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.20473/jeba.v35i12025.147-165

Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A. A., & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are women eco‐friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3146–3161. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2563

Naveed, K., Voinea, C. L., & Roijakkers, N. (2022). Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, and Firm’s Green Innovation Performance: Evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892551

Nekhili, M., Bennouri, M., & Nagati, H. (2022). Do Board Gender Quotas Benefit Minority Shareholders? An Illustration through Related-Party Transactions. British Journal of Management, 33(2), 724–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12467

Ni, K., Zhang, R., Tan, L., & Lai, X. (2024). How ESG enhances corporate competitiveness: Mechanisms and Evidence. Finance Research Letters, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106249

Omenihu, C. M., & Nwafor, C. (2025). Board Structure and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of National Governance Quality. Administrative Sciences, 15(8), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080314

Oriaifoh, C. L., & Lodikero, O. (2025). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Sustainability Reporting of Listed Firms in a Developing Country: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(IV), 5545–5556. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400395

Osemene, O. F., Adinnu, P., Fagbemi, T. O., & Olowookere, J. K. (2024). Corporate Governance and Environmental Accounting Reporting in Selected Quoted African Companies. Global Business Review, 25(4), 1096–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211010989

Pernamasari, R., & Chariri, A. (2024). Characteristics of the Audit Committee and the Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Performance in Indonesian Companies. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i21.16716

Pirveli, E. (2025). Sustainability Disclosure, CEO Duality, and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Georgia. Globalization and Business, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.35945/gb.2025.19.001

Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411

Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2019). An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1707

Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2020). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427

Rodríguez-Fernández, M., Sánchez-Teba, E. M., López-Toro, A. A., & Borrego-Domínguez, S. (2019). Influence of ESGC indicators on financial performance of listed travel and leisure companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195529

Ruziwa, R. M., Mvunabandi, J. D., & Nomlala, B. C. (2025). “Audit committee characteristics and environmental, social, and governance reporting quality: An analysis of top 100 JSE-listed corporations.” Accounting and Financial Control, 6(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.21511/afc.06(1).2025.04

Shakri, I. H., Chung, C. Y., & Ryu, D. (2025). Do board networks fuel ESG controversies? Finance Research Letters, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107641

Sihombing, T., & Nurhaliza, H. K. (2025). The Influence of Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Quality on ESG Performance With Sustainable Growth Rate as a Moderation Variable. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 9(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i3p3

Solikhah, B., & Weng, P.-Y. (2024). The Link Between ESG Reporting Quality and Accounting Measures of Firm-Level Performance. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 16(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v16i1.1634

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Sustainalytics. (2021). ESG Disclosure and Performance in Southeast Asia. Sustainalytics. https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-research/resource/investors-esg-blog/esg-disclosure-and-performance-in-southeast-asia

Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2022). Shareholder litigation rights and ESG controversies: A quasi-natural experiment. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102396

Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2024a). ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4218–4232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3697

Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2024b). ESG controversies, corporate governance, and the market for corporate control. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 14(4), 815–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2334253

Trireksani, T., Djajadikerta, H. G., Kamran, M., & Butt, P. (2024). The Impact of Country Characteristics on Board Gender Diversity and Sustainability Performance: A Global Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073057

Vargas-Santander, K. G., Álvarez-Diez, S., Baixauli-Soler, S., & Belda-Ruiz, M. (2025). Do financial constraints lead to environmental, social and governance controversies? The role of country context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 965–981. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4025

Velte, P. (2022). Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 997–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w

Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: an agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1879

Voinea, C. L., Rauf, F., Naveed, K., & Fratostiteanu, C. (2022). The Impact of CEO Duality and Financial Performance on CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises in China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010037

Wan Mohammad, W. M., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2020). Effect of audit committee independence, board ethnicity and family ownership on earnings management in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2019-0001

Wirianata, H., & Hauw-Sen, T. (2024). Moderation Of Firm Size On The Effect Of Financial Performance On Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi, 28(03), 400–224. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v28i3.2068

Wong, S. M. H., Chan, R. Y. K., Wong, P., & Wong, T. (2025). Promoting corporate financial sustainability through ESG practices: An employee-centric perspective and the moderating role of Asian values. Research in International Business and Finance, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102733

Wu, R., Hossain, Md. A., Teng, Z., & Shen, X. (2023). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value of Chinese Firms: Exploring from Degree of Internationalization. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2023, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7249799

Wu, S., Li, X., Du, X., & Li, Z. (2022). The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114507

Yin, J., & Xu, J. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Board Size on ESG Controversies: New Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114855

Yu, E. P.--, Luu, B. Van, & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192

Yuhertiana, I., Husna, G. A., & Susilowati, E. (2025). Audit Committee and ESG Disclosure: Advancing SDG for Sustainable Performance in State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e05042. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n01.pe05042

Yuliyanti, L., Solikin, I., Disman, D., & Mulyana, D. (2025). The Moderating Effect of Firm Size on the Relationship Between Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors and Firm Value: Evidence from Asia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v12i1.39175