Peran Moderasi Prio Opinion Terhadap Hubungan Prediksi Kebangkrutan Dengan Opini Audit Going Concern

Authors

  • Rudi Zulfikar Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang
  • Anggie Lestari Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang
  • Nana Nofianti Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang
  • Kurniasih Dwi Astuti Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v27i1.847
Keywords: Bankruptcy Prediction; Firm Size; Going Concern Audit Opinion; Prior Opinion, Year Dummy

Abstract

This study examines the effect of ongoing bankruptcy predictions on audit opinions with previous opinions as moderating variables in the manufacturing industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2014-2019 period. Measurement of bankruptcy prediction variables using Altman's. Z-Score. The sampling technique used in this research is the purposive sampling method. In addition, the regression analysis the model used to examine the interaction of bankruptcy prediction variables with previous opinions uses Moderated. Regression Analysis (MRA). The test results prove that the bankruptcy prediction as measured by Altman's Z-Score has a negative effect on ongoing concern audit opinion. Other evidence confirms that the prior opinion variable as measured by the dummy variable reduces the relationship between bankruptcy prediction and going concern audit opinion.


Author Biographies

Rudi Zulfikar, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang

rz-zulfikar72@untirta.ac.id

Anggie Lestari, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang

anggi@yahoo.com

Nana Nofianti, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang

nofianti@untirta.ac.id

Kurniasih Dwi Astuti, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang

nien_rz@untirta.ac.id

References

Achyarsyah, P. (2016). The Analysis of The Influence of Financial Distress, Debt Default, Company Size, and Leverage on Going Concern Opinion. Repository.Unas.Ac.Id, 14(10), 6767–6783. http://repository.unas.ac.id/id/eprint/62.

Ajisaka, M. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Financial Distress, Dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Opinion Logit Model. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-06-2013-0033.

Alaminos, D., Castillo, A. D., and Fernández, M. Á. (2020). Going Concern Opinion Prediction For Football Clubs: Evidence From The Spanish League. Scielo.Org.Mx. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0186-10422020000100105&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en.

Blanco Oliver, A. J., Irimia Diéguez, A. I., Oliver Alfonso, M. D., and Wilson, N. (2015). Improving Bankruptcy Prediction In Micro-Entities By Using Nonlinear Effects And Non-Financial Variables. Finance a Úvěr-Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 65(2), 81. https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/80856.

Blay, A. D., Bryan, D., & Reynolds, J. K. (2016). The Going-Concern Market Anomaly Revisited. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2747774.

Cenciarelli, V. G., Greco, G., and Allegrini, M. (2018). External Audit And Bankruptcy Prediction. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(4), 863–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9406-z.

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., and Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review And Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419.

Dewi, N. N. K., Badera, I. D. N., and Astika, I. B. P. (2016). Prior Opinion Dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Model Prediksi Kebangkrutan Altman Pada Pemberian Opini Going Concern. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 5(11), 3857–3884.

Guo, Y., Delaney, D., and Ahmed, A. (2020). Is an Auditor’s Propensity to Issue Going Concern Opinions a Valid Measure of Audit Quality? Australian Accounting Review, 30(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/AUAR.12300.

Hadi, K. K., Gunawan, H., dan Utomo, H. (2015). Pengaruh Likuiditas Solvabilitas Dan Model Predikisi Kebangkrutan (Altman Z-Score) Terhadap Pemberian Opini Going Goncern. Prosiding Akuntansi; Vol 1, No 1, Prosiding Akuntansi (Februari, 2015); 294-303. http://repository.unisba.ac.id:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/24420.

Hutagalung, S. R., dan Triyanto, D. N. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Kondisi Keuangan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. 8(1), 104–111.

Kingyens, A. T., Paradi, J. C., and Tam, F. (2016). Bankruptcy Prediction of Companies in the Retail-Apparel Industry Using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 249, 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48461-7_13.

Kozjak, S. K. (2020). Auditor’s Going Concern Assessment In The Republic Of Croatia. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, October, 130–141.

Krishnan, G. V., and Wang, C. (2015). The Relation between Managerial Ability and Audit Fees and Going Concern Opinions. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(3), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-50985.

Kurnia, R., and Cellica, L. (2016). The Impact of Bankruptcy Prediction, Company’s Financial Condition, Previous Year Audit Opinion, Firm Size and Audit Tenure Towards Auditor’s Going Concern Opinion. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3000214.

Maffei, M., Fiondella, C., Zagaria, C., and Zampella, A. (2020). A Multiple Discriminant Analysis Of The Auditor’s Going Concern Opinion: The Case Of Audit Opinions In Italy. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(6), 1179–1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2019-0514.

Mavengere, K. (2015). Predicting Corporate Bankruptcy And Earnings Manipulation Using The Altman Z-Score And Beneish M Score. The Case Of Z Manufacturing Firm In Zimbabwe. Author Details: Kudakwashe MAVENGERE- Lupane State University,Department of Accounting and Finance. 10, 8–14.

McKeown, J., Mutchler, J., and W, H. (1991). Toward an Explanation of Auditor Failure to Modify the Audit Reports of Bankrupt Companies. A Journal Of Practice & Theory, 10, 1-13.

Mutchler, J. (1984). Auditors’ Perception of The Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Auditing : A Journal Of Practice and Theory, 17–30.

Nurkhasanah, N. A., dan Nurbaiti, A. (2020). Kondisi Keuangan, Manajemen Laba Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Properti dan Real Estate yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2018). ISEI Accounting Review, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36217/IAR.V4I1.130.

Pham, N. K., Duong, H. N., Quang, T. P., Ho, N., and Thuy, T. (2017). Audit Firm Size, Audit Fee, Audit Reputation and Audit Quality: The Case of Listed Companies in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v9i1.10074.

Salawu, R. O., Oladejo, T. M., and Inneh, E. G. (2017). Going Concern And Audit Opinion Of Nigerian Banking Industry. Accounting & Taxation, 9(1), 63–72.

Saputra, I. (2019). Determinasi Financial dan Non Financial Faktor terhadap Keputusan Opini Audit Modifikasi Going Concern (Prediksi Kebangrutan Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI). Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(1), 15–35.

Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136200.

Sugiarto, avif R. B. D., dan Fidiana. (2020). Pengaruh Kebangkrutan , Gagal Bayar , Dan Opini Audit Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi.

Syarif, R. M., Saebani, A., dan Julianto, W. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan dan Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 9(2), 197–207. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/1108.

Xu, H., Dao, M., and Wu, J. (2018). The Effect Of Real Activities Manipulation On Going Concern Audit Opinions For Financially Distressed Companies. Review of Accounting and Finance, 17(4), 514–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-09-2016-0135.

Xu, Q., and Kalelkar, R. (2020). Consequences of Going-Concern Opinion Inaccuracy at the Audit Office Level. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(3), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-18-050.

Yunus, M., Calen, C., dan Sirait, S. (2020). Pengaruh Prediksi Kebangkrutan Model Altman Z-Score, Reputasi Auditor dan Opinion Shopping terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Owner, 4(1), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v4i1.174.

Zaher, A. A. (2015). Going-Concern Opinions, Executive Tenure and Gender. 3(7), 59–78.

Ziȩba, M., Tomczak, S. K., and Tomczak, J. M. (2016). Ensemble Boosted Trees With Synthetic Features Generation In Application To Bankruptcy Prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 58, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2016.04.001.

Minerva, L., Sumeisey, S. V., Stefani., Wijaya, S., dan Lim, A. C. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Ratio, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Audit Lag terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi. Vol. 4 No. 1.

Diyanti, F. T. (2012). Pengaruh Debt Default, Pergantian Auditor, dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern.

Anisykurillah, I., dan Azizah, R. (2014). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Debt Default, dan Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Accounting Analysis Journal.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Rudi Zulfikar, Anggie Lestari, Nana Nofianti, & Kurniasih Dwi Astuti. (2022). Peran Moderasi Prio Opinion Terhadap Hubungan Prediksi Kebangkrutan Dengan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ekonomi, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v27i1.847

Issue

Section

Articles